Su (2026) Impact of reference evapotranspiration method selection on hydrologic partitioning and climate sensitivity in forest-dominated watersheds
Identification
- Journal: Mendeley Data
- Year: 2026
- Date: 2026-09-22
- Authors: Qiong Su
- DOI: 10.17632/pxrvz5d8kg.1
Research Groups
- Department of Hydrology, University of South Carolina
- Institute of Water Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Short Summary
This study investigates the impact of reference evapotranspiration (ETref) method selection on hydrologic partitioning and climate sensitivity in forest-dominated watersheds. The results show that different ETref methods can lead to significant variations in simulated hydrological processes.
Objective
- Investigate how different ETref methods affect hydrologic partitioning and climate sensitivity in forest-dominated watersheds
Study Configuration
- Spatial Scale: Watersheds located in South Carolina, USA
- Temporal Scale: Daily time step for discharge simulations and monthly time step for evapotranspiration calculations
Methodology and Data
- Models used: Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and the South Carolina Hydrologic and Water Quality System (SC.HAWQS)
- Data sources: Satellite data, observation data from USGS gauges, reanalysis datasets
Main Results
- Different ETref methods (FAO-PM, SWAT-PM, Hargreaves, etc.) lead to significant variations in simulated actual evapotranspiration (ETa) and hydrological processes.
- The relative errors of ETref calculated using different methods range from 10% to 30%.
- The results also show that the choice of ETref method can affect climate sensitivity in forest-dominated watersheds.
Contributions
- This study provides new insights into the impact of ETref method selection on hydrologic partitioning and climate sensitivity, highlighting the importance of careful model calibration and validation.
- The findings have implications for improving the accuracy of watershed-scale hydrological modeling and predicting climate change impacts.
Funding
- Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51879203) and the University of South Carolina Research Grant Program.
Citation
@article{Su2026Impact,
author = {Su, Qiong},
title = {Impact of reference evapotranspiration method selection on hydrologic partitioning and climate sensitivity in forest-dominated watersheds},
journal = {Mendeley Data},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.17632/pxrvz5d8kg.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.17632/pxrvz5d8kg.1}
}
Original Source: https://doi.org/10.17632/pxrvz5d8kg.1